The tendency for longwall panels to become longer and wider and for machinery to become larger increases panel resistance making the ventilation task more challenging, particularly when development constraints from time or cost considerations lead to the need to minimize the amount of development which is acceptable. Generally, the thinner the seam, the more difficult the challenge becomes.
The provision of high ventilating pressures by the use of large surface fans and/or underground booster fans is becoming more frequent, but this entails high capital and operating costs and is not always an option in seams liable to spontaneous combustion. The fact that all longwalls have some airflow through goaves means that particular attention is required to methods and standards where spontaneous combustion is a risk. All longwalls, especially those which do not extract the full seam, leave some coal in the goaf as well as chain pillars each side, and this remaining coal in a poorly ventilated goaf can form ideal situations for spontaneous combustion to occur.
There are 3 basic ways of ventilating a longwall panel:
-
"U Ventilation" where intake air comes in the maingate and
returns in the tailgate; there is no connection to any airways behind the face
line. If a longwall advancing face is ever used, this is the only means of
ventilation available.
U Ventilation
-
"R Ventilation" in which the main ventilation circuit is
as for U ventilation, but there is another connection (a "bleed") maintained to return airways behind the
face.
R Ventilation
-
"Z or Y Ventilation" where both main and tailgates carry intake
air and all the return air is carried to main returns behind the face. With
this system a variable regulator on the maingate intake is often used to adjust
the balance between face flow and maingate intake flow.
Z or Y Ventilation
For U and R ventilation, the air flow across the face itself is from main to tail (in the opposite direction to the coal flow and sometimes referred to as "antitropal" ventilation). For Z ventilation the flow is from tail to main (or "homotropal"). If Uni-di cutting is used the air flow direction will govern the direction of cutting.
With regard to controlling gas concentrations in the airways (and face temperatures if these are a problem), the greater the air flow the better in general. However on a longwall face where there is invariably a lot of dust and fine coal, air velocities of more than 3-4 metres/second become very uncomfortable and this may limit the quantity of air which can reasonably be supplied. This is one reason that U ventilation may be unsuccessful.
With R ventilation, the gas make from the face and goaf is split in 2 directions, some diluted by the face air and some by air which passes the face and becomes a bleed to other main returns. With the Z system all the gas passes to the returns behind the face, but extra intake air is added to the flow from the face adjacent to the maingate.
There can be two problems with returning face air through the tailgate end of the face:
-
There will be a
tendency for air to sweep the goaf edge behind the supports and bring gas over
the tailgate end of the face and the tailgate drive. To avoid gas problems in
this area it is often necessary to erect a brattice wing from the goaf edge
past the tail gate drive and allow air from the goaf to mix and be diluted
further outbye. This entails erecting and maintaining brattice in often poor
working conditions.
-
Access to any part of
the tailgate may be difficult (or impossible) while the face is operating
because of dust or gas levels, so that any tailgate work can only be carried
out during scheduled longwall outages or downtimes.
With the R and Z systems, local control of the ventilation is often carried out using pressure measurements at regulators rather than measuring flows, the pressure values for ideal conditions being determined by experience. At times reference is made to "holding gas in the goaf" by adjusting the pressure across it, so the gas does not contaminate the face area. In fact the process is actually holding the gas front in the goaf away from the face. Because the goaf is open ended any gas make must be removed somewhere and it is prevented from coming onto the face by being dragged towards some other location - it is not actually "held" in the goaf.
If it is not possible to control any gas make successfully by diluting it with ventilation, there are three possibilities, either as alternatives or in conjunction:
-
The use of "sewer" airways where higher gas levels than that
normally permitted by statutory limits are allowed and personnel access is
prevented unless production is stopped and gas levels reduced.
-
Cross-measure post
drainage where boreholes are drilled through the strata above and/or below the
seam and connected to a gas drainage range to capture some of the gas before it
can reach the mine airways.
-
Goaf drainage where gas
is drawn from the goaf cavity either underground by pipes which are open to the
goaf area and connected to a gas drainage range or direct to surface through
boreholes drilled to (or close to) the goaf cavity from the surface.
It may be possible to use the longwall direction of mining in relation to seam dip to assist in gas control; for a goaf where methane predominates, buoyancy effects of the gas will assist in keeping gas away from the face if it is worked down dip; if carbon dioxide predominates working up-dip will assist. It is more likely for this benefit to be obtained as a bonus as other factors are more likely to determine mining layouts and mining directions.
0 komentar:
Post a Comment